Kate Bachtell, NORC, University of Chicago*
Micah Sjoblom, NORC, University of Chicago
Catherine Haggerty, NORC, University of Chicago
Shannon Nelson, NORC, University of Chicago
Steven Pedlow, NORC, University of Chicago
Joanne Hsu, Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System
In this paper we share results from two distinct approaches to incentive escalation implemented for the 2019 Survey of Consumer Finances (SCF). The SCF is funded triennially by the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System (FRB). Both escalation approaches were informed by well-documented, positive effects of monetary incentives on survey response (Godwin 1979, Church 1993, Goritz 2006, Singer and Couper 2008, Hsu et.al 2017), but varied considerably in design and execution. For the first approach, we developed an algorithm to identify SCF households that presented the most challenges for data collection and devised an experiment to isolate the impact of offering an escalated incentive - double the amount of the initial offer - beginning in week 11 of the field period. For the second approach, we worked closely with our field management team to design localized incentive escalation efforts that leveraged the presence of specialist interviewers in distinct frame areas. In this paper we highlight challenges balancing cost and other operational considerations, and examine the overall efficacy on the probability of survey participation, for each approach.
Shannon Nelson, NORC, University of Chicago*
Catherine Haggerty, NORC, University of Chicago
Nella Coleman, NORC, University of Chicago
Kate Bachtell, NORC, University of Chicago
Micah Sjoblom, NORC, University of Chicago
Steven Pedlow, NORC, University of Chicago
Jesse Bricker, Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System
The Survey of Consumer Finances (SCF) is the premier source of information on the financial circumstances of American households. It is used by researchers and policymakers to inform important monetary policy impacting individuals, households, businesses and the overall economy. The accuracy and integrity of the SCF data is paramount. The SCF has a long tradition of engaging in continuous improvement across all survey processes. While the processes and procedures used to validate interviewer work has been examined and small changes made each round, the methods used have remained largely constant, with the first two interviews and a random ten percent of cases completed thereafter selected for validation. The use of tablets during the 2019 round allowed the robust set of validation data points to include the use of real-time tracking software to examine multiple GPS data points and the collection of electronic signatures from respondents which proved to be an additional means to identify potential falsified data. In this presentation we will review the standard validation measures used by the SCF in past rounds and describe a new proprietary data falsification system.
Lisa Lee, NORC, University of Chicago*
Richard Windle, Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System
Catherine Haggerty, NORC, University of Chicago
Shannon Nelson, NORC, University of Chicago
Frankie Duda, NORC, University of Chicago
Kate Bachtell, NORC, University of Chicago
Micah Sjoblom, NORC, University of Chicago
Steven Pedlow, NORC, University of Chicago
The SCF collects personal financial data that is both complex and sensitive, potentially affecting likelihood to reply via the web. In recent years, a number of studies have explored the use of web and mobile surveys to collect household financial data. (Jackle et al., 2017; see also Lessof et al., 2017 and Read, 2017). The results of these studies are promising and informed potential designs to include in the 2019 SCF web survey. However, it is important to note that the studies completed to date have not collected financial data via the web at the level of detail required for the SCF. The 2019 SCF included a test to allow for an assessment of how the SCF would perform in a self-administered web context. The web test included a subset of the SCF questionnaire with a range of different question types. The test successfully concluded with 222 respondents completing both a web and an interview-administered instrument. We present preliminary findings from this test including the web test methodology and the quality of the data collected.
Heather Sawyer, NORC, University of Chicago*
Kate Bachtell, NORC, University of Chicago
Catherine Haggerty, NORC, University of Chicago
Shannon Nelson, NORC, University of Chicago
Micah Sjoblom, NORC, University of Chicago
Kevin Moore, Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System
Jesse Bricker, Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System
Richard Windle, Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System
Joanne Hsu, Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System
The Survey of Consumer Finances (SCF) is the most comprehensive source of household financial data in the U.S. It collects a broad range of financial information, which can often be complex in nature. Field interviewers are the main conduit between the survey instrument and survey participants, and as a result, minimizing interviewer error is an important aspect in achieving high data quality. Beginning in 2004 the SCF has given interviewers detailed feedback about the quality of their work throughout the data collection period. In 2019 the project team implemented ongoing field interviewer training with an improved and enhanced individually tailored Data Quality Report. The report, generated from case reviews of each interview as they were completed, provided analyses of data quality and both praised good work and highlighted survey errors. The goal was to provide targeted feedback and lesson plans to address each interviewer's unique learning needs. Doing so on a large-scale survey project presents many challenges. This paper describes interviewer feedback efforts and the operational challenges.
Katie Archambeau, NORC, University of Chicago*
Kate Bachtell, NORC, University of Chicago
Cathy Haggerty, NORC, University of Chicago
Shannon Nelson, NORC, University of Chicago
Micah Sjoblom, NORC, University of Chicago
Steven Pedlow, NORC, University of Chicago
Kevin Moore, Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System
Adaptive Survey Design (ASD) involves strategies that inform adjustments in data collection procedures based on quantifiable metrics (Groves and Heeringa, 2006). R-indicators may be used within ASD to estimate the degree to which the sample represents the larger population and/or which sample segments are under- or over-producing (Schouten et al., 2009). This information may then spur interventions to improve the representativeness of key subgroups, reduce effort on 'unproductive' cases, and streamline survey operations (Cohen, 2019). In this paper we describe the use of R-indicators for the 2019 Survey of Consumer Finances (SCF), funded by the Federal Reserve Board. We first discuss the process of computing the R-indicators using data from the 2016 and 2019 SCF area probability samples, along with population estimates from the American Community Survey. We then present retrospective results from the 2016 SCF and discuss implications for 2019. Finally, we share findings for the 2019 SCF area probability sample. We contribute to a larger body of work on R-indicators by assessing representativeness and improving efficiency and data quality in survey research.