This paper reports the results of research and analysis undertaken by Census Bureau Staff. It has undergone a more limited review than official Census Bureau publications. This report is released to inform interested parties of research and to encourage discussion.
On March 1, 2001, the U.S. Census Bureau issued the recommendation of the Executive Steering Committee for A.C.E. Policy (ESCAP) that the Census 2000 Redistricting Data not be adjusted based on the Accuracy and Coverage Evaluation (A.C.E.). By mid-October 2001, the Census Bureau had to recommend whether Census 2000 data should be adjusted for future uses, such as the census long form data products, post-censal population estimates, and demographic survey controls. In order to inform that decision, the ESCAP requested that further research be conducted.
Between March and September 2001, the Demographic Analysis-Population Estimates (DAPE) research project addressed the discrepancy between the demographic analysis data and the A.C.E. adjusted estimates of the population. Specifically, the research examined the historical levels of the components of population change to address the possibility that the 1990 Demographic Analysis understated the national population and assessed whether demographic analysis had not captured the full population growth between 1990 and 2000. Assumptions regarding the components of international migration (specifically, emigration, temporary migration, legal migration, and unauthorized migration) contain the largest uncertainty in the demographic analysis estimates. Therefore, evaluating the components of international migration was a critical activity in the DAPE project.
This report focuses on the evaluation of the U.S. Census Bureau's estimate of net migration between Puerto Rico and the United States in the 1980s and 1990s. Specifically, the review process evaluated and critiqued the previous estimates of net migration from Puerto Rico to the U.S. in the 1980s and created an estimate for the 1990s. To produce the estimate of net migration from Puerto Rico, the Census Bureau used an adjusted residual survival method.
Our evaluation resulted in an estimate of net migration between Puerto Rico and the U.S. of 126,465 in 1980s and 111,336 in 1990s. For both periods, migrants from Puerto Rico were more often male than female, were overwhelmingly Hispanic, and would have identified their race as being either "white" or "other". In addition, the pattern of the net migration varied by age, with flows being generally positive (toward the U.S.) for those below age 40 and negative (away from the U.S.) above age 40. Future research will focus on finding and processing administrative data that is available in the post-censal period and that will allow the estimation of both in- and out-flows of migrants between the U.S. and Puerto Rico.
The previous 1980-90 estimate: These estimates were done in a two-stage process. First, passenger traffic data for Puerto Rico were used to obtain an estimate of net international migration for Puerto Rico for the period 1980-1990. Subsequently, this estimate was adjusted using information on legal permanent international migration of foreign nationals into Puerto Rico during 1980-1990. The resultant figure, 288,163, was assumed to represent net migration from Puerto Rico to the United States for this period.
The current approach: During the process of reviewing the methods used to produce estimates and projections in the 1990s, it was determined that the passenger traffic data were too unreliable to be used for this purpose. In its place, an adjusted residual survival method was adopted and is used to the present day. Hence, this method was used by Team 10 to produce the estimates of net migration from Puerto Rico to the United States for both the 1980-1990 and 1990-2000 periods.
The adjusted residual survival method can be summarized in the following steps:
a. The population by sex and 5-year age groups from the census of Puerto Rico in the base year (i.e., 1980 or 1990) is entered into the International Programs Center's Rural Urban Projection program (RUP). RUP is a population projection program that projects each age and sex cohort over time based on the components of growth (fertility, mortality, and migration).
b. The base population is survived to the end year (i.e., 1990 or 2000) using vital registration data for each year (both births by sex and deaths by age and sex) and an assumption of zero net migration.
c. The survived population by single years of age and sex is exported from the RUP program. It is then subtracted from the enumerated population in the end year (i.e., 1990 or 2000) by single years of age and sex to arrive at a 10-year estimate of net international migration for Puerto Rico by single years of age and sex.
d. These totals are divided by 10 to arrive at an estimate of net annual international migration from Puerto Rico by age in the end year. Then, the total in each age group is moved back 5 years in order to approximate the age at which the migrants moved.
a. The number of migrants with intended residence in Puerto Rico by single years of age and sex is extracted from the INS micro-data files for each year of the period under investigation (i.e., 1980-1990 or 1990-1998)
Note: 2000 INS micro-data file was not available at the time of this work, so it was not considered in the analysis.
b. The panels of data (migrants by age and sex) for the time period under analysis are added together and then divided by the number of panels in order to arrive at an estimate of the average annual number of legal migrants moving to Puerto Rico in that period.
c. The results from (b) are added to the results from 1(d) to arrive at the estimate of the annual average net migration from Puerto Rico to the United States.
a. "Cohortize" the assumed number of net migrants for each year from Puerto Rico to the United States in the period under investigation. Specifically, take the estimate of the average annual number of net migrants, assume these migrants moved in one of the years under investigation (i.e., 1980-1990 or 1990-2000), and convert the age of these migrants to the age in the end year (i.e., 1990 or 2000).
b. Sum the totals by age and sex from (a) This gives the "cohortized" estimate of net international migration for Puerto Rico for the 10 year period by age in the target year and sex.
a. Use data from 1990 census on US residents in 1990 who lived in Puerto Rico 5 years earlier by age, sex, race (5 categories), and Hispanic Origin (yes/no) as pattern for flow of migrants from the United States to Puerto Rico.
b. Use data from 1990 census on Puerto Rico residents in 1990 who lived in United States 5 years earlier by age and sex as pattern for flow of migrants from Puerto Rico to the United States.
c. Apply race/Hispanic Origin proportions from (a) to (b) to obtain age, sex, race, and Hispanic Origin pattern of flow of migrants from Puerto Rico to the United States.
d. Subtract (a) from (c) to get an age, sex, race, and Hispanic Origin pattern of net migration from Puerto Rico to the United States.
e. Apply pattern from (d) to 10-year totals from 3(b) (above) to arrive at the 10-year estimate of net migrants from Puerto Rico the United States by age, sex, race, and Hispanic Origin.
Aside from the obvious questions that could be raised about the adequacy of the chosen methods to give an accurate estimate of migration between Puerto Rico and the United States, there are two limitations of the estimates that deserve mention.
The work of Team 10 resulted in this document, two SAS program files, and two excel spreadsheets containing the estimates of migration by age, sex, race, and Hispanic Origin. The locations of each of these files are listed below. In addition, Tables A and B give a summary of the two sets of estimates:
Age | 1980s | 1990s | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
Males | Females | Males | Females | |
<1 | 63 | 55 | 46 | 40 |
1-4 | 1,405 | 1,203 | 1,124 | 998 |
5-9 | 3,229 | 2,862 | 3,431 | 3,250 |
10-14 | 2,894 | 2,597 | 4,716 | 4,512 |
15-19 | 10,670 | 7,629 | 10,130 | 8,221 |
20-24 | 26,954 | 19,395 | 21,821 | 16,841 |
25-29 | 28,200 | 21,809 | 25,931 | 20,208 |
30-34 | 12,254 | 11,069 | 16,493 | 13,322 |
35-39 | 1,455 | 2,903 | 5,284 | 5,095 |
40-44 | -1,248 | 941 | -245 | 1,339 |
45-49 | -2,444 | 36 | -3,330 | -1,111 |
50-54 | -2,632 | -391 | -5,412 | -3,519 |
55-59 | -3,070 | -1,170 | -5,798 | -4,166 |
60-64 | -4,211 | -2,428 | -6,478 | -4,587 |
65-69 | -4,331 | -2,541 | -6,134 | -4,195 |
70-74 | -2,685 | -699 | -3,668 | -1,983 |
75-79 | -1,735 | -205 | -1,322 | -259 |
80+ | -686 | -682 | 201 | 540 |
64,082 | 62,383 | 56,790 | 54,546 | |
126,465 | 111,336 |
Race | 1980s | 1990s | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Hispanic | Non-Hispanic | Total | Hispanic | Non-Hispanic | Total | |
White | 50,487 | 3,358 | 53,845 | 42,961 | 2,392 | 45,353 |
Black | 5,539 | 696 | 6,235 | 4,866 | 645 | 5,511 |
AIAN | 182 | 31 | 213 | 145 | 38 | 183 |
API | 462 | 306 | 768 | 385 | 271 | 656 |
Other | 65,196 | 208 | 65,404 | 59,471 | 162 | 59,633 |
Total | 121,866 | 4,599 | 126,465 | 107,828 | 3,508 | 111,336 |
To summarize these tables, three points stand out:
Deardorff, K. and L. Blumerman. 2001. Evaluating Components of International Migration: Estimates of the Foreign-Born Population by Migrant Status: 2000. (Population Division Working Paper #58) (December 2001) U.S. Census Bureau.
Perry, M., B. Van der Vate, L. Auman, and K. Morris. 2001. Evaluating Components of International Migration: Legal Migrants. (Population Division Working Paper #59) (December 2001) U.S. Census Bureau.
Cassidy, R. and L. Pearson. 2001. Evaluating Components of International Migration: Temporary (Legal) Migrants. (Population Division Working Paper #60) (December 2001) U.S. Census Bureau.
Costanzo, J., C. Davis, C. Irazi, D. Goodkind, R. Ramirez. 2001. Evaluating Components of International Migration: The Residual Foreign Born. (Population Division Working Paper #61) (December 2001) U.S. Census Bureau.
Mulder, T., B. Guzmán, and A. Brittingham. 2001. Evaluating Components of International Migration: Foreign-Born Emigrants. (Population Division Working Paper #62) (December 2001) U.S. Census Bureau.
Gibbs, J., G. Harper, M. Rubin, H. Shin. 2001. Evaluating Components of International Migration: Native Emigrants. (Population Division Working Paper #63) (December 2001) U.S. Census Bureau.
Christenson, M. 2001. Evaluating Components of International Migration: Migration Between Puerto Rico and the United States. (Population Division Working Paper #64) (December 2001) U.S. Census Bureau.
Cresce, A., R. Ramirez, and G. Spencer. 2001. Evaluating Components of International Migration: Quality of Foreign-Born and Hispanic Population Data. (Population Division Working Paper #65) (December 2001) U.S. Census Bureau.
Malone, N. 2001. Evaluating Components of International Migration: Consistency of 2000 Nativity Data. (Population Division Working Paper #66) (December 2001) U.S. Census Bureau.