Although both direct multi-step-ahead forecasting and iterated one-step-ahead forecasting are two popular methods for predicting future values of a time series, it is not clear that the direct method is superior in practice, even though from a theoretical perspective it has lower mean squared error (MSE). A given model can be fitted according to either a multi-step or a one-step forecast error criterion, and we show here that discrepancies in performance between direct and iterative forecasting arise chiefly from the method of fitting, and is dictated by the nuances of the model's misspecification. We derive new formulas for quantifying iterative forecast MSE, and present a new approach for assessing asymptotic forecast MSE. Finally, the direct and iterative methods are compared on a retail series, which illustrates the strengths and weaknesses of each approach.

Others in Series

Working Paper

Counterexamples to Parsimony and BIC

April 01, 1991

This note presents examples of nested and non-nested regression model pairs for which the likelihood-ratio sequence is bounded in probability.

Working Paper

Optimal Real-Time Filters for Linear Prediction Problems

April 09, 2016

The classic model-based paradigm in time series analysis is rooted in the Wold decomposition of the data-generating process into an uncorrelated WN process.

Working Paper

Spectral Density and Spectral Distribution Inference

April 24, 2014

This paper studies taper-based estimates of the spectral density utilizing a fixed bandwidth ratio asymptotic framework.

View All

Related Information

Time Series and Seasonal Adjustment Working Papers

Page Last Revised - October 8, 2021

Some content on this site is available in several different electronic formats. Some of the files may require a plug-in or additional software to view.

Is this page helpful?
Thumbs Up Image

Yes

NO THANKS

255 characters maximum

255 characters maximum reached

Thank you for your feedback.
Comments or suggestions?

Top