U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Skip Header


Evaluating Discrepancies in Print Reading Disability Statistics through Cognitive Interviews

Written by:
SSM2007-09

Abstract

An expert review of two print reading disability measures whose estimates differ widely - the National Health Interview Survey (NHIS) and the Survey of Income and Program Participation (SIPP) - was conducted. Cognitive interviews (n = 30) were then conducted with respondents who had impaired visual acuity. Three interview conditions in which question order and context were varied were established to explore the factors respondents considered when answering the survey questions. Results indicated that respondents’ comprehension regarding concepts across the two surveys was equivalent, but the surveys’ concepts differed in terms of the operationalization of print disability severity level. The surveys also differed regarding frame of reference for use of visual assistance prosthetics. These two differences did not appear to affect respondent interpretations of the questions. Context in which the print disability questions appear was a major difference between the surveys and may have affected responses.

Page Last Revised - October 8, 2021
Is this page helpful?
Thumbs Up Image Yes Thumbs Down Image No
NO THANKS
255 characters maximum 255 characters maximum reached
Thank you for your feedback.
Comments or suggestions?

Top

Back to Header