U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Skip Header


The Impact of Survey and Questionnaire Design on Longitudinal Labor Force Measures

Written by:
Working Paper Number SEHSD-WP1991-01 or SIPP-WP-142

Abstract

In this paper we examine the tradeoffs between two methods of collecting labor force data, retrospective questions versus repeated interviews.  In the case of gross change measures, such as month-to-month flows between labor force states, retrospective measures tend to understate change, while repeated interviews seem to overstate change because of response variability.  In the case of measures of experience—the amount of time spent in a labor force state within a given time frame—retrospective measures tend to be affected by recall bias, which lead to the undercounting of short periods spent in that state.  On the other hand, experience measures constructed from repeated interviews can be affected by selective attrition, since only observations with a complete set of interviews can be used.

Page Last Revised - October 8, 2021
Is this page helpful?
Thumbs Up Image Yes Thumbs Down Image No
NO THANKS
255 characters maximum 255 characters maximum reached
Thank you for your feedback.
Comments or suggestions?

Top

Back to Header